<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>João Ferreira &#187; puzzles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joaoff.com/tag/puzzles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joaoff.com</link>
	<description>Programming, Algorithms, and Mathematics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:41:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Multiples in the Fibonacci series</title>
		<link>http://www.joaoff.com/2008/05/09/multiples-in-the-fibonacci-series/</link>
		<comments>http://www.joaoff.com/2008/05/09/multiples-in-the-fibonacci-series/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 16:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calculational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fibonacci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[puzzles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joaoff.com/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found the following problem on K. Rustan M. Leino&#8217;s puzzles page: [Carroll Morgan told me this puzzle.] Prove that for any positive K, every Kth number in the Fibonacci sequence is a multiple of the Kth number in the Fibonacci sequence. More formally, for any natural number n, let F(n) denote Fibonacci number n. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the following problem on <a href="http://research.microsoft.com/~leino/puzzles.html#Multiples%20in%20the%20Fibonacci%20series" title="K. Rustan M. Leino's puzzles page">K. Rustan M. Leino&#8217;s puzzles page</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
[Carroll Morgan told me this puzzle.]</p>
<p>Prove that for any positive K, every Kth number in the Fibonacci sequence is a multiple of the Kth number in the Fibonacci sequence.</p>
<p>More formally, for any natural number n, let F(n) denote Fibonacci number n. That is, F(0) = 0, F(1) = 1, and F(n+2) = F(n+1) + F(n).  Prove that for any positive K and natural n, F(n*K) is a multiple of F(K).
</p></blockquote>
<p>This problem caught my attention, because it looks like a good example for using a result that I have derived last year. My result gives a <a href="http://www.joaoff.com/publications/JFFs/JFF0" title="JFF0: Distributivity and the greatest common divisor">reasonable sufficient condition for showing that a function distributes over the greatest common divisor</a> and shows that the Fibonacci function satisfies the condition.</p>
<p>In fact, using the property that the Fibonacci function distributes over the greatest common divisor, we can solve this problem very easily. Using <img class="lateximg" src='http://www.joaoferreira.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-latexrenderer/pictures/5bd9fcfb08d175f1ee80d815885549fb.png' title="LaTeX Formula" alt="LaTeX Formula" /> to denote the Fibonacci number <img class="lateximg" src='http://www.joaoferreira.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-latexrenderer/pictures/55a049b8f161ae7cfeb0197d75aff967.png' title="LaTeX Formula" alt="LaTeX Formula" />, <img class="lateximg" src='http://www.joaoferreira.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-latexrenderer/pictures/67f8900bb348ad7405c6997613c56dab.png' title="LaTeX Formula" alt="LaTeX Formula" /> to denote the greatest common divisor of <img class="lateximg" src='http://www.joaoferreira.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-latexrenderer/pictures/0e51a2dede42189d77627c4d742822c3.png' title="LaTeX Formula" alt="LaTeX Formula" /> and <img class="lateximg" src='http://www.joaoferreira.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-latexrenderer/pictures/55a049b8f161ae7cfeb0197d75aff967.png' title="LaTeX Formula" alt="LaTeX Formula" />, and <img class="lateximg" src='http://www.joaoferreira.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-latexrenderer/pictures/1df00dc7bb553d90756ea6002bd9fbb3.png' title="LaTeX Formula" alt="LaTeX Formula" /> to denote the division relation, a possible proof is:</p>
<div class="latex-margin">
<img class="lateximg" src='http://www.joaoferreira.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-latexrenderer/pictures/ee86026bd72cb024a4ace884b6116f7f.png' title="LaTeX Formula" alt="LaTeX Formula" />
</div>
<p>The crucial step is clearly the one where we apply the distributivity property. Distributivity properties are very important, because they allow us to rewrite expressions in a way that prioritizes the function that has the most relevant properties. In the example above we could not simplify <img class="lateximg" src='http://www.joaoferreira.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-latexrenderer/pictures/76f243059e8bb3a9cacdc63b2f968769.png' title="LaTeX Formula" alt="LaTeX Formula" /> nor <img class="lateximg" src='http://www.joaoferreira.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-latexrenderer/pictures/7b2ebadea81fc6279c1af91202d106e8.png' title="LaTeX Formula" alt="LaTeX Formula" />, but applying the distributivity property prioritised the <img class="lateximg" src='http://www.joaoferreira.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-latexrenderer/pictures/ce98e3d3fbb19473820b37950cb2ca99.png' title="LaTeX Formula" alt="LaTeX Formula" /> operator &#8212; and we know how to simplify <img class="lateximg" src='http://www.joaoferreira.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-latexrenderer/pictures/d13fe68318d5bf8d74cc8c1d92cb7d03.png' title="LaTeX Formula" alt="LaTeX Formula" />. Furthermore, in practice, distributivity properties reduce to simple syntactic manipulations, thus reducing the introduction of error and simplifying the verification of our arguments.</p>
<p>(Now that I think about it, perhaps it would be a good idea to write a note on distributivity properties, summarizing their importance and their relation with symbol dynamics.)</p>
<p>If you have any corrections, questions, or alternative proofs, please leave a comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.joaoff.com/2008/05/09/multiples-in-the-fibonacci-series/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
